Building a Better Statewide Online Conversation!

Forum Rules (click here)

01

Colorado

We're talking about how to improve STATE policies here, NOT federal or local policies. 

When Coloradans are engaged in respectful conversation, looking at issues through the shared lens of the state that we all love, we have unending faith in their ability to work together to find the right solutions for our state.

02

Non-Partisan

Building a Better Colorado is non-partisan, and so is this online dialogue. 

As with our in-person discussions, Building a Better Colorado takes NO POSITION on the issues which we tee-up for conversation.   Our only goal is to host an honest and respectful conversation among Coloradans who share a love for our state and want to leave it better than we found it.  

03

Civil

We want YOU to participate in this conversation, and we want you to participate constructively.   This isn't a public "bathroom wall" where you can vent your frustrations anonymously.   Accountability is essential to every honest conversation and we require that you register in order to participate and own your comments.   If you aren't comfortable putting your name on what you want to say, then you probably shouldn't say it.   

Forum Rules and Etiquette

  • Stay on the topics of Colorado state policy.   Not federal or local policies.

  • Be respectful of others, even though you’re welcome to strongly disagree with them.   No incivility, personal attacks or hate speech.

  • Be polite.  No foul language; this is a mixed crowd.

  • Be real.   No trolling, novelty accounts, or bots.

  • No solicitation: petitions/volunteer hours/signups.

  • Try to learn from others’ opinions more than you espouse your own.

  • Look for opportunities to agree!

You can view our forum and topics below as a guest, or register to join the Statewide Conversation. Registration is easy, and Building a Better Colorado will never sell or share your information.

Notifications
Clear all

Economic Impact of Gallagher Amendment  

 

Bryon Taylor
(@bryon-taylor)
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 5
21/09/2020 4:34 pm  

Has any of our state economists or economic development groups come up with any projections regarding whether a significant bloc of development was lost to another state as a result of the Gallagher Amendment? I know municipal and city fire protection and other services have been limited by the ratio, but is there any data regarding lost revenue as a result of Gallagher, or would that be too difficult to quantify? 

Specifically, it seems that in many counties in the state that are already hurting for new development and revenue would be even less attractive for new businesses looking to move into the state if the ratio of residential property eclipsed business property in various rural areas. Are there any specific cases of a county losing new development to other counties or states as a result of their residential-to-property levels?


Quote
Join the Conversation

Join the Conversation

Learn more about Colorado fiscal policy and join the conversation as we discuss how to Build a Better Colorado!

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Share This